Abstract

Duplicated genes frequently evolve at different rates. This asymmetry is evidence of natural selection's ability to discriminate between the 2 copies, subjecting them to different levels of purifying selection or even permitting adaptive evolution of one or both copies. However, if gene duplication creates pairs of protein-coding sequences that are initially identical, this raises the question of how selection tells the 2 copies apart. Here, we investigated asymmetric sequence divergence of recently duplicated genes in rodents and related this to 2 possible sources of such asymmetry: gene relocation as a consequence of duplication and retrotransposition as a mechanism of gene duplication. We found that most young rodent duplicates that have been relocated were created by retrotransposition. The degree of rate asymmetry in gene pairs where one copy has been relocated (either by retrotransposition or DNA-based duplication) is greater than in pairs formed by local DNA-based duplication events. Furthermore, by considering the direction of transposition for distant duplicates, we found a consistent tendency for retrogenes to undergo accelerated protein evolution relative to their static paralogs, whereas DNA-based transpositions showed no such tendency. Finally, we demonstrate that the faster sequence evolution of retrogenes correlates with the profound alteration of their expression pattern that is precipitated by retrotransposition.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.