Abstract

Action observation is the visual process analyzing the actions of others to determine their goals and how the actor’s body (part) movements permit attaining those goals. Our recent psychophysical study demonstrated that 1) observed action (OA) perception differs from shape perception in viewpoint and duration dependence, and 2) accuracy and reaction times of OA discrimination are fitted by the proportional-rate diffusion model whereby a sensory stage provides noisy evidence that is accumulated up to a criterion or bound by a decision stage. That study was devoted to observation of manipulative actions, following a general trend of the field. Recent functional imaging studies of action observation, however, have established various OA classes as separate entities with processing routes involving distinct posterior parietal cortex (PPC) regions. Here, we show that the diffusion model applies to multiple OA classes. Even more importantly, the observers’ ability to discriminate exemplars of a given class differs considerably between OA classes and these performance differences correspond to differences in model parameters. In particular, OA classes differ in the bound parameter which we propose may reflect an urgency signal originating in the PPC regions corresponding to the sensory stages of different OA classes.

Highlights

  • Action observation refers to the visual process of assessing the goals of actions performed by conspecifics, and how the effector movements allow achieving those goals[1]

  • Because these sensory cues are processed in different parts of posterior parietal cortex (PPC), which houses a coarse map of effectors[4], the various sensorimotor transformations are computed in different PPC regions

  • As a first goal, this study shall test the applicability of the diffusion model to observed action (OA) classes other than manipulative hand actions

Read more

Summary

OPEN Not all observed actions are perceived equally

Action observation is the visual process analyzing the actions of others to determine their goals and how the actor’s body (part) movements permit attaining those goals. Our recent psychophysical study demonstrated that 1) observed action (OA) perception differs from shape perception in viewpoint and duration dependence, and 2) accuracy and reaction times of OA discrimination are fitted by the proportional-rate diffusion model whereby a sensory stage provides noisy evidence that is accumulated up to a criterion or bound by a decision stage. A one-way ANOVA indicated that accuracy threshold values were significantly different amongst the 3 OA classes (one-way ANOVA: F2,52 = 13.03, p < 0.01) with locomotion actions discrimination having lowest threshold (Fig. 3A, gray; 13.2 ± 0.34) values followed by manipulative hand (Fig. 3A, light gray; 16.3 ± 0.51) and skin displacing (Fig. 3A, black; 21.1 ± 0.59) actions.

Materials and Methods
Findings
Additional Information
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call