Not All Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients with Microvascular Invasion After R0 Resection Could Be Benefited from Prophylactic Transarterial Chemoembolization: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

Abstract

BackgroundProphylactic transarterial chemoembolization (p-TACE) is strongly recommended for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with microvascular invasion (MVI), but the potential beneficiaries remain controversial.MethodsData of HCC patients with MVI who underwent R0 resection between December 2013 and December 2015 were identified through the primary liver cancer big data. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients who received p-TACE or not using Kaplan–Meier survival curves before and after propensity scoring match (PSM).ResultsA total of 695 patients were eligible for this study, including 199 patients (28.6%) receiving p-TACE and 496 patients (71.4%) receiving resection alone. In the crude cohort, median DFS and OS were longer in the p-TACE group than those in the non-TACE group without significant differences (25.0 months vs 24.2 months, P=0.100; 48.0 months vs 46.5 months, P=0.150; respectively), but significant differences were observed both in DFS and OS (both P<0.05) after 1:1 PSM. p-TACE was identified as one of the independent risk factors of both DFS and OS using multivariate analysis in the matched cohort (HR=0.69, 95% CI=0.54–0.88; HR=0.66, 95% CI=0.50–0.88; respectively). Subgroup analysis showed that p-TACE could beneficiate patients if they were male, aged ≥50 years old, had HBV infection, preoperative AFP level ≥400 ng/mL, Child-Pugh grading A, no transfusion, single tumor, tumor diameter ≥5cm, Edmondson–Steiner grading I/II, capsule, or BCLC stage A, CNLC stage Ib, AJCC stage II both in DFS and OS (all P<0.05).ConclusionWith the current data, we concluded that not all HCC patients with MVI would be benefited from p-TACE, and p-TACE could benefit patients with “middle risk” according to the current staging systems.