Abstract

The objective of the paper is to provide the revision of the Nosology of Constitutional Disorders of Bone that incorporates newly recognized disorders and reflects new molecular and pathogenetic concepts. Criteria for inclusion of disorders were (1) significant skeletal involvement corresponding to the definition of skeletal dysplasias, metabolic bone disorders, dysostoses, and skeletal malformation and/or reduction syndromes, (2) publication and/or MIM listing, (3) genetic basis proven or very likely, and (4) nosologic autonomy confirmed by molecular or linkage analysis and/or distinctive diagnostic features and observation in multiple individuals or families. Three hundred seventy-two different conditions were included and placed in 37 groups defined by molecular, biochemical and/or radiographic criteria. Of these conditions, 215 were associated with one or more of 140 different genes. Nosologic status was classified as final (mutations or locus identified), probable (pedigree evidence), or bona fide (multiple observations and clear diagnostic criteria, but no pedigree or locus evidence yet). The number of recognized genetic disorders with a significant skeletal component is growing and the distinction between dysplasias, metabolic bone disorders, dysostoses, and malformation syndromes is blurring. For classification purposes, pathogenetic and molecular criteria are integrating with morphological ones but disorders are still identified by clinical features and radiographic appearance. Molecular evidence leads to confirmation of individual entities and to the constitution of new groups, but also allows for delineation of related but distinct entities and indicates a previously unexpected heterogeneity of molecular mechanisms; thus, molecular evidence does not necessarily simplify the Nosology, and a further increase in the number of entities and growing complexity is expected. By providing an updated overview of recognized entities with skeletal involvement and of the underlying gene defects, the new Nosology can provide practical diagnostic help, facilitate the recognition of new entities, and foster and direct research in skeletal biology and genetic disorders.

Highlights

  • Fifty years ago, in 1969, an international team of experts in radiology, orthopedic surgery, pediatrics and genetics convened in Paris to develop an International Nomenclature of Constitutional Diseases of Bone (1970; 1971a; 1971b; McKusick & Scott, 1971)

  • The goal was to reach an agreement on the nomenclature of several genetic skeletal disorders that were reported since the early sixties

  • After the establishment of the International Skeletal Dysplasia Society (ISDS) in 1999, revisions of the Nomenclature (Nosology) were delegated to an expert committee nominated within the ISDS and representing a good mix of clinical, radiological and genetics expertise

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In 1969, an international team of experts in radiology, orthopedic surgery, pediatrics and genetics convened in Paris to develop an International Nomenclature of Constitutional Diseases of Bone (1970; 1971a; 1971b; McKusick & Scott, 1971). The goal was to reach an agreement on the nomenclature of several genetic skeletal disorders that were reported since the early sixties. There was growing evidence that genetic skeletal disorders were more heterogeneous than previously thought. After the establishment of the International Skeletal Dysplasia Society (ISDS) in 1999, revisions of the Nomenclature (Nosology) were delegated to an expert committee nominated within the ISDS and representing a good mix of clinical, radiological and genetics expertise. We provide the 2019 revision and 10th edition of the Nosology and Classification of Genetic Skeletal Disorders

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call