Abstract

Detailed topographic maps of the western Nebraska North Platte River-South Platte River confluence area show a low relief and gently sloping southeast-oriented upland surface, asymmetrical drainage divides, nearly adjacent and parallel east-oriented North and South Platte River valley segments, barbed tributaries, and shallow divide crossings (low points along drainage divides) in a region south of the Nebraska Sand Hills and at the Nebraska loess region’s western margin. Published interpretations of North and South Platte River confluence area landforms (referred to as the accepted paradigm) do not explain most drainage features and are compared with a new paradigm’s interpretations to determine which of the two paradigms explains the regional drainage history and related surface features in a simple and consistent manner. New paradigm interpretations require large sheets of slowly-moving southeast-oriented water to have flowed toward what was probably an actively eroding Republican River valley and to have shaped the upland surface while the Platte and North and South Platte River valleys eroded headward into and across the region so as to create the asymmetric drainage divides, barbed tributaries, and shallow divide crossings. These new paradigm interpretations are consistent with each other and with recently published new paradigm interpretations of upstream North and South Platte River drainage system history. New paradigm interpretations also suggest the adjacent Nebraska Sand Hills developed on a large flood deposited delta (typical of sand dune areas on former glacial lake deltas further to the north) and the slowly-moving sheets of water may have been responsible for some or all of Nebraska’s loess deposits, although the new paradigm leads to a fundamentally different middle and late Cenozoic regional geologic and glacial history than what workers using the accepted paradigm have described.

Highlights

  • Introduction1.1 Statement of the ProblemTo a geomorphologist the Platte River drainage system in Colorado, Wyoming, and Nebraska (shown in figure 1) poses several puzzling questions

  • 1.1 Statement of the ProblemTo a geomorphologist the Platte River drainage system in Colorado, Wyoming, and Nebraska poses several puzzling questions

  • To the east of the North and South Platte River confluence area the asymmetric divide continues between the Platte and Republican River drainage basins to the Platte River bend where a similar asymmetric divide between the Platte River and Big Blue River drainage basins begins

Read more

Summary

Introduction

1.1 Statement of the ProblemTo a geomorphologist the Platte River drainage system in Colorado, Wyoming, and Nebraska (shown in figure 1) poses several puzzling questions. Why do South Platte River headwaters flow in a southeast direction before turning in a north-northeast and a northeast direction? These questions and many others arise because many North and South Platte River drainage system features like those in many other drainage systems represent anomalous evidence the commonly accepted paradigm does not explain. No matter how the upstream North and South Platte River drainage systems evolved, the southeast-oriented downstream North Platte River and northeast-oriented downstream South Platte River segments must in some way have originated in what is today the confluence area. Detailed topographic maps of that confluence area show divide crossings (low points along drainage divides), asymmetric drainage divides, barbed tributaries, and other erosional landform features offering clues as to how the southeast-oriented North Platte River and northeast-oriented South Platte River valleys originated. This paper compares how the accepted and new geomorphology paradigms permit that detailed topographic map evidence to be interpreted

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call