Abstract

Rorqual whales are among the most species rich group of baleen whales (or mysticetes) alive today, yet the monophyly of the traditional grouping (i.e., Balaenopteridae) remains unclear. Additionally, many fossil mysticetes putatively assigned to either Balaenopteridae or Balaenopteroidea may actually belong to stem lineages, although many of these fossil taxa suffer from inadequate descriptions of fragmentary skeletal material. Here we provide a redescription of the holotype of Megaptera miocaena, a fossil balaenopteroid from the Monterey Formation of California, which consists of a partial cranium, a fragment of the rostrum, a single vertebra, and both tympanoperiotics. Kellogg (1922) assigned the type specimen to the genus Megaptera Gray (1846), on the basis of its broad similarities to distinctive traits in the cranium of extant humpback whales (Megaptera novaeangliae (Borowski, 1781)). Subsequent phylogenetic analyses have found these two species as sister taxa in morphological datasets alone; the most recent systematic analyses using both molecular and morphological data sets place Megaptera miocaena as a stem balaenopteroid unrelated to humpback whales. Here, we redescribe the type specimen of Megaptera miocaena in the context of other fossil balaenopteroids discovered nearly a century since Kellogg’s original description and provide a morphological basis for discriminating it from Megaptera novaeangliae. We also provide a new generic name and recombine the taxon as Norrisanima miocaena, gen. nov., to reflect its phylogenetic position outside of crown Balaenopteroidea, unrelated to extant Megaptera. Lastly, we refine the stratigraphic age of Norrisanima miocaena, based on associated microfossils to a Tortonian age (7.6–7.3 Ma), which carries implications for understanding the origin of key features associated with feeding and body size evolution in this group of whales.

Highlights

  • Rorqual whales include the largest vertebrates to have ever evolved in the history of life

  • Despite recent insights into evolutionary trends in body size for these taxa (Slater, Goldbogen & Pyenson, 2017), the overall phylogenetic relationships among extant lineages of rorquals remain a work in progress (Árnason et al, 2018)

  • We provide a detailed redescription of this taxon, explain how it differs from Megaptera and other crown and fossil balaenopteroids, and provide more details about its stratigraphic age and relevance for the evolution of rorquals and gray whales

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rorqual whales include the largest vertebrates to have ever evolved in the history of life. The second reoccurring hypothesis (Fig. 1B) includes Eschrichtiidae nested within Balaenopteridae, and Megaptera within Balaenoptera This overall pattern has been supported by molecular (McGowen, Spaulding & Gatesy, 2009; Sasaki et al, 2006) and combined morphological and molecular data sets (Marx & Fordyce, 2015; Slater, Goldbogen & Pyenson, 2017), including both fossil and extant taxa, as well from putative extinct members of Balaenopteridae and Eschrichtiidae sensu lato (Marx & Kohno, 2016; Slater, Goldbogen & Pyenson, 2017). This hypothesis recovers a monophyletic Balaenopteridae but does not recover a monophyletic genus Balaenoptera (Fig. 1C)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call