Abstract

Based on primary data from India, this paper analyses the reasons underlying women’s low labour force participation. In developing countries, women engaged in unpaid economic work in family enterprises are often not counted as workers. Women are involved in expenditure-saving activities, i.e. productive work within the family, over and above domestic chores and care work. We document the fuzziness of the boundary between domestic and unpaid (and therefore invisible) productive work which leads to mismeasurement of women’s work. Religion and visible markers such as veiling are not significant determinants of the probability of being in paid work, but the social norm that matters as a major constraint is that of being primarily responsible for domestic chores. We demonstrate the existence of ‘virtuous cycles’ within families: a history of working women in the family increases the probability of being in paid work by between 18 and 21 percentage points.

Highlights

  • Background and motivation for the study does India have one of the lowest female labour force participation rates (FLFPR) in the world but it has been declining steadily since 2004

  • Given that the primary responsibility for domestic chores falls on women, we argue that the conventional definition of cultural norms needs to be revised and shifted to focus on the real culprit, i.e. the cultural norm which places the burden of domestic chores almost exclusively on women

  • Based on primary data from a large household survey in seven districts in West Bengal in India, this paper analysed the reasons underlying the low rates of labour force participation of women

Read more

Summary

Background and motivation for the study

Does India have one of the lowest female labour force participation rates (FLFPR) in the world but it has been declining steadily since 2004. In better understanding what explains women’s historically low participation rates, a phenomenon which predates the present decline and which has persisted despite the classic preconditions for women’s increased participation in the labour force: high rates of growth, rising levels of female education, and lower rates of fertility. For reasons which we explain below, we believe that we still do not understand the longer-standing constraints that have curtailed women’s ability to participate in the labour force, regardless of current trends. Our main findings are that, as women are primarily responsible for routine domestic tasks such as cooking, cleaning, and household maintenance, (over and above the standard explanations in the literature—age, location, education, and so on), as well as for elderly care, this lowers their probability of working. We show that ‘good’ family traditions, i.e. a history of older women (mothers or mothers-in-law) having worked, increases the probability of women being in paid work by between 18 and 21 percentage points, over and above standard controls

Alternative explanations for low female LFPRs in India
Contributions to the literature
Revisiting the measurement issue
NSS 2011–12
Determinants of LFPRs
Domestic work and labour-saving devices
Is there an unmet demand for work?
Can the presence of a family tradition increase FLFP?
Findings
Concluding comments
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.