Abstract
Common reference values of arterial stiffness indices could be effective screening tool in detecting vascular phenotypes at risk. However, populations of the same ethnicity may differ in vascular phenotype due to different environmental pressure. We examined applicability of normative equations for central augmentation index (cAIx) derived from Danish population with low cardiovascular risk on the corresponding Croatian population from the Mediterranean area. Disagreement between measured and predicted cAIx was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis. Both, cAIx-age distribution and normative equation fitted on Croatian data were highly comparable to Danish low-risk sample. Contrarily, Bland-Altman analysis of cAIx disagreement revealed a curvilinear deviation from the line of full agreement indicating that the equations were not equally applicable across age ranges. Stratification of individual data into age decades eliminated curvilinearity in all but the 30–39 (men) and 40–49 (women) decades. In other decades, linear disagreement independent of age persisted indicating that cAIx determinants other than age were not envisaged/compensated for by proposed equations. Therefore, established normative equations are equally applicable to both Nordic and Mediterranean populations but are of limited use. If designed for narrower age ranges, the equations’ sensitivity in detecting vascular phenotypes at risk and applicability to different populations could be improved.
Highlights
As a further step in dealing with this issue, two studies proposed novel sex-13 and ethnic-specific[14] normative equations that allow a standardized comparison between individual augmentation index (AIx) measurements and the calculated reference value, taking into account the subjects’ age, body height, and heart rate
Janner et al generated a new sex – specific internally validated equation adjusted for age, heart rate, and height in order to calculate reference values of central augmentation index (cAIx) that can be used to complement the interpretation of individual hemodynamic assessments among men and women in the Danish population with a low cardiovascular risk[13]
We focused on Danish normative equations, since we used the same measuring device, method of calculating cAIx, as well as the same inclusion/exclusion criteria in selecting a cohort with a low cardiovascular risk
Summary
As a further step in dealing with this issue, two studies proposed novel sex-13 and ethnic-specific[14] normative equations that allow a standardized comparison between individual augmentation index (AIx) measurements and the calculated reference value, taking into account the subjects’ age, body height, and heart rate. Janner et al generated a new sex – specific internally validated equation adjusted for age, heart rate, and height in order to calculate reference values of cAIx that can be used to complement the interpretation of individual hemodynamic assessments among men and women in the Danish population with a low cardiovascular risk[13]. The predictive equations from these two studies, cannot be directly compared because of differences in the method of computing AIx and the selection criteria of the reference sample from which normative data were acquired Both studies, opened the question on the potential effect of the living environment on population reference values of cAIx. Whether the proposed equations based on data from the Danish population can be applied to a population of a similar ethnic background from a different geographic region, life style, and cultural heritage remains to be answered. Considering that the age is the most important determinant of cAIx, and that hemodynamic changes across ages differently inter-relate with arterial stiffness indices[15,16], we tested applicability of equations in different age decades of the examined population sample
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have