Abstract

This study presents the performance standards for an assessment tool, constituted by two different tasks, elaborated to evaluate reading comprehension of narrative texts. Retelling and a questionnaire based on the story “The Thing” permitted the evaluation of children from the 1st to 3rd grades, whereas the same tasks based on the story “The Rabbit and the Dog” assessed children from the 4th to 6th grade. The study included 176 children (51.7% girls) between seven and 12 years old, from the first to sixth grade of elementary school, from public and private schools in Porto Alegre-RS. Normative scores for children from the 1st to 6th grades were divided by years of education and type of school. Descriptive statistics (mean and standard deviation) and comparison of the scores on the reading comprehension tasks were carried out using years of education and type of school (public and private) of children (Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis). Compared to younger children from initial grades, older children from advanced grades showed a better performance in reading comprehension. Students from private schools performed better when compared to students from public schools. The assessment tool seems to be useful to distinguish performances of children from different years of education and type of schools and it is easily applied. Clinicians, researchers and professionals in the school environment can use the instrument.

Highlights

  • This study presents the performance standards for an assessment tool, constituted by two different tasks, elaborated to evaluate reading comprehension of narrative texts

  • La tarea de volver a contar y el cuestionario de la historia “La Cosa” permite evaluar los niños del primero al tercero grados, mientras que las mismas tareas desde la historia “El Conejo y el Perro” evalúan a los niños entre cuarto e sexto grados

  • O desenvolvimento da compreensão leitora não corresponde apenas a causas internas, como as capacidades cognitivas e linguísticas próprias à criança, que facilitam ou dificultam a aquisição dessa habilidade

Read more

Summary

Procedimentos gerais e instrumentos para garantia dos critérios de inclusão

O estudo foi aprovado pelo Comitê de Ética em Pesquisa do Instituto de Psicologia (protocolo 2008/067) da UFRGS. A correção dos recontos das histórias (evocações livres) e sua classificação nas diferentes categorias também foram feitas por juízes independentes. Os recontos podem ser classificados em cinco categorias (adaptadas de Brandão & Spinillo, 2001) conforme o grau de compreensão, da categoria 1 que corresponde a reproduções desconectadas de frases com presença de reconstruções, até a categoria 5, que supõe uma reprodução completa da história, em que as ideias centrais e as inferências são reproduzidas de maneira articulada (para a caracterização completa das categorias ver Corso & Salles, 2009; para exemplos de inferências, interferências e reconstruções nos recontos da história “A Coisa” ver Salles & Parente, 2004). Os resultados desta tarefa são apresentados em termos de médias de questões respondidas corretamente

Análise de dados
Porcentagem Macroestrutura
Findings
CONSIDERAÇÕES FINAIS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call