Abstract

In yeast, the pol3-01,L612M double mutant allele, which causes defects in DNA polymerase delta (Pol δ) proofreading (pol3-01) and nucleotide selectivity (pol3-L612M), confers an “ultramutator” phenotype that rapidly drives extinction of haploid and diploid MMR-proficient cells. Here, we investigate antimutator mutations that encode amino acid substitutions in Pol δ that suppress this lethal phenotype. We find that most of the antimutator mutations individually suppress the pol3-01 and pol3-L612M mutator phenotypes. The locations of many of the amino acid substitutions in Pol δ resemble those of previously identified antimutator substitutions; however, two novel mutations encode substitutions (R674G and Q697R) of amino acids in the fingers domain that coordinate the incoming dNTP. These mutations are lethal without pol3-L612M and markedly change the mutation spectra produced by the pol3-01,L612M mutator allele, suggesting that they alter nucleotide selection to offset the pol3-L612M mutator phenotype. Consistent with this hypothesis, mutations and drug treatments that perturb dNTP pool levels disproportionately influence the viability of pol3-L612M,R674G and pol3-L612M,Q697R cells. Taken together, our findings suggest that mutation rate can evolve through genetic changes that alter the balance of dNTP binding and dissociation from DNA polymerases.

Highlights

  • The emergence of cell lineages with synergistic mutator alleles conforms to evolutionary theory

  • The evolution of mutation rate occurs through the acquisition of mutator and antimutator traits that optimize DNA replication fidelity[63]

  • The most radical antimutator innovations of evolution are unquestionably proofreading and mismatch repair (MMR), which involved the recruitment of protein domains or entire complexes to enhance the accuracy of DNA replication

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The emergence of cell lineages with synergistic mutator alleles conforms to evolutionary theory. Yeast cells undergoing EEX experience strong selection pressure for eex mutants with “antimutator” alleles that lower mutation rates to tolerable levels[38,39,44,45,46,47]. In this present study, we investigate eex mutations that suppress the ultramutator phenotype of a double mutant allele (pol3-01,L612M) created by combining the classic pol[] mutation, which compromises proofreading, with a mutation encoding an L612 to M substitution in the Pol δactive site[32,48]. We explore this question of allele-specificity and examine the structural implications of the eex substitutions in order to understand their underlying antimutator mechanisms

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call