Abstract

Structural equation models (SEMs) can be estimated using a variety of methods. For complete normally distributed data, two asymptotically efficient estimation methods exist: maximum likelihood (ML) and generalized least squares (GLS). With incomplete normally distributed data, an extension of ML called “full information” ML (FIML), is often the estimation method of choice. An extension of GLS to incomplete normally distributed data has never been developed or studied. In this article we define the “full information” GLS estimator for incomplete normally distributed data (FIGLS). We also identify and study an important application of the new GLS approach. In many modeling contexts, the variables in the SEM are linear composites (e.g., sums or averages) of the raw items. For instance, SEMs often use parcels (sums of raw items) as indicators of latent factors. If data are missing at the item level, but the model is at the composite level, FIML is not possible. In this situation, FIGLS may be the only asymptotically efficient estimator available. Results of a simulation study comparing the new FIGLS estimator to the best available analytic alternative, two-stage ML, with item-level missing data are presented.

Highlights

  • This article proposes a new missing data estimator for incomplete normally distributed data under an ignorable missingness mechanism (Little and Rubin, 2002)

  • We summarize existing approaches to dealing with continuous item-level missing data when the model is at the composite level

  • We describe the extension of full information” generalized least squares (FIGLS) to item-level missing data

Read more

Summary

Introduction

This article proposes a new missing data estimator for incomplete normally distributed data under an ignorable missingness mechanism (Little and Rubin, 2002). Under an MAR mechanism, missingness does not depend on any variables in the dataset that contain missing values. State-of-the-art methods for dealing with ignorable missingness in the case of normal data include full information maximum likelihood (FIML; Arbuckle, 1996; Allison, 2003) and multiple imputation (MI; Rubin, 1987; Schafer, 1997). These approaches perform very in large samples (Collins et al, 2001; Larsen, 2011; Yuan et al, 2012). One could say that the problem of missing data in the case when data are normally distributed and missingness is ignorable has been solved

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call