Abstract
Abstract. A normal contact stiffness model considering 3D topography and elastic–plastic contact of rough surfaces is presented in this paper. The asperities are generated from the measured surfaces using the watershed segmentation and a modified nine-point rectangle. The topography parameters, including the asperity locations, heights, and radii of the summit, are obtained. Asperity shoulder–shoulder contact is considered. The relationship of the contact parameters, such as the contact force, the deformation, and the mean separation of two surfaces, is modelled in the three different contact regimes, namely elastic, elastic–plastic and fully plastic. The asperity contact state is determined, and if the contact occurs, the stiffness of the single asperity pair is calculated and summed as the total normal stiffness of two contact surfaces. The developed model is validated using experimental tests conducted on two types of specimens and is compared with published theoretical models.
Highlights
Contact behaviour of mechanical joint surfaces has a great influence on a mechanical system’s static–dynamic property and thermal–electrical conductivity
This paper presents a normal contact stiffness model considering 3D topography and elastic–plastic contact of rough surfaces
The developed model is validated using experimental tests conducted on two types of specimens and is compared with published theoretical models
Summary
Contact behaviour of mechanical joint surfaces has a great influence on a mechanical system’s static–dynamic property and thermal–electrical conductivity. The pioneering work of Greenwood and Williamson (1966) assumed that mechanical joint surfaces were represented by a population of hemispherically tipped asperities which had an identical radius of curvature. They assumed that these asperities followed a Gaussian distribution, and that the contact of two mechanical joint surfaces was constituted by micro-contacts between asperities. Most models mentioned above only concerned the relationships between normal contact load and normal interference of asperity summits. These models cannot explain some problems such as contact stiffness, contact damping, etc. The developed model is validated using experimental tests conducted on two types of specimens and is compared with published theoretical models
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
