Abstract

The placement of left atrial catheters following cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) allows accurate monitoring of left ventricular filling pressures, as well as access for the infusion of vasoactive drugs. While the left atrial administration of norepinephrine (NE) is thought to provide higher systemic arterial NE levels while minimizing any pulmonary vasoconstriction, no study critically compares central venous and left atrial NE infusion following cardiopulmonary bypass. A canine model was used to compare central venous and left atrial NE infusion at three dosages (0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 μg/kg/min) both prior to CPB and following 2 hr of hypothermic CPB at 27°C. Prior to CPB, there was no difference in the hemodynamic efficacy of central venous and left atrial NE infusion at any dosage. The pulmonary circulation metabolized 16-29% of circulating NE. Only at the 0.2 μg/kg/min dose was there a difference in the arterial NE level between central venous (3474 ± 486 pg/ml) and left atrial (5504 ± 751 pg/ml, P = 0.019) NE administration. Above this dose, no difference in the arterial NE level was identified. Following 2 hr of CPB, the pulmonary endothelium metabolized a significantly higher percentage of circulating NE (3542%). Despite this increased extent of pulmonary metabolism, there was no difference in the hemodynamic efficacy or the resulting arterial NE level of central venous and left atrial NE infusion at a given dose. In conclusion, the results demonstrate: (1) increased pulmonary NE uptake following CPB, and (2) no difference in hemodynamic efficacy between central venous and left atrial NE infusion over a wide range of three doses in a model with normal lungs.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.