Abstract

Contemporary Buddhist violence against minority Muslims in Myanmar is rightfully surprising: a religion with its particular moral philosophies of non-violence and asceticism and with its functional polytheism in practice should not generate genocidal nationalist violence. Yet, there are resources within the Buddhist canon that people can draw from to justify violence in defense of the religion and of a Buddhist-based polity. When those resources are exploited in the context of particular Theravāda Buddhist practices and the history of Buddhism and Buddhist identity in Burma from ancient times through its colonial and contemporary periods, it perpetuates an ongoing tragedy that is less about religion than about ethno-nationalism.

Highlights

  • The Precept of Non-Violence and the Philosophy of PacifismBuddhism’s first precept is to avoid killing any living being, not just people but even the most insignificant of animals

  • Contemporary Buddhist violence against minority Muslims in Myanmar is rightfully surprising: a religion with its particular moral philosophies of non-violence and asceticism and with its functional polytheism in practice should not generate genocidal nationalist violence

  • It explores these elements within the context of Theravāda Buddhism in colonial Buddhist groups in Myanmar (Burma) and contemporary Myanmar

Read more

Summary

The Precept of Non-Violence and the Philosophy of Pacifism

Buddhism’s first precept is to avoid killing any living being, not just people but even the most insignificant of animals. In the 1970s, communist victories in Vietnam, Laos, and Cambodia spawned a militant anti-communist Buddhist nationalist movement in Thailand, led by monk Phra Kittivuddho, whose “Nawaphon” movement considered it a monk’s sacred duty to defend the Thai nation and religion with violence if necessary. His slogan “Killing Communists is Not a Sin” was an exception due to national emergency, he contended, as communists were “not complete persons” but rather “destroyers of. Nation, religion, or monarchy who are bestial”; and he offered a form of “double effect” argument in advising that monks “must not intend to kill people, only to kill the Devil” presumably residing within the offenders.

Double Effect
Asceticism to Overcome Human Suffering
Limits of Ascetic Withdrawal from Worldly Societal Concerns
Syncretizing Social Influences
Functional Polytheism and Its Influences
Religion as Lived Experience
Modern State Capacity
Contemporary Myanmar
Colonial Rule and Buddhist Activism
Findings
Religious Nationalism Under a Constitutional Republic

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.