Abstract

Non-traditional stable isotopes have increasingly been applied to studies of igneous processes including planetary differentiation. Equilibrium isotope fractionation of these elements in silicates is expected to be negligible at magmatic temperatures (δ57Fe difference often less than 0.2 per mil). However, an increasing number of data has revealed a puzzling observation, e.g., the δ57Fe for silicic magmas ranges from 0‰ up to 0.6‰, with the most positive δ57Fe almost exclusively found in A-type granitoids. Several interpretations have been proposed by different research groups, but these have so far failed to explain some aspects of the observations. Here we propose a dynamic, diffusion-induced isotope fractionation model that assumes Si-melts are growing and ascending immiscibly in a Fe-rich bulk magma chamber. Our model offers predictions on the behavior of non-traditional stable isotope such as Fe, Mg, Si, and Li that are consistent with observations from many A-type granitoids, especially those associated with layered intrusions. Diffusion-induced isotope fractionation may be more commonly preserved in magmatic rocks than was originally predicted.

Highlights

  • Line represents a hypothetical diffusional profile for the corresponding pure FeO isotope endmember

  • Significant Soret diffusional isotope fractionation in the laboratory[24,25]. Another attempt to explain the enrichment of heavy Fe isotopes in some A-type granitoids invokes fluid exsolution, i.e. a fluid in equilibrium with a magnetite-bearing magma is removed from a system[13,14]

  • The mean force constant calibration for bulk Fe in magmas is another recent attempt in improving understanding of the equilibrium Fe isotope effect in igneous rocks[27]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Line represents a hypothetical diffusional profile for the corresponding pure FeO isotope endmember. During the growth of a crystal or an immiscible liquid, the heavier Fe isotope is expected to be relatively enriched at the high end of a concentration gradient, i.e., at the interfacial melt (Fig. 1).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call