Nontendinous healing after repairing of retracted rotator cuff tear: an imaging study.

Abstract

Follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after rotator cuff repair can sometimes demonstrate healing with nontendinous tissue that extends from the footprint to the retracted tendon end, which is inferred as fibrous tissue formation. The aim was to investigate this particular finding and its significance. There were 494 eligible cases of healed supero-posterior medium-sized to massive rotator cuff repairs, after the exclusion of retears. A retrospective review was performed for the 3 groups that were divided according to their MRI appearances of healing: type I described the direct healing of the tendon to the footprint, whereas type II demonstrated the distinctive continuity of nontendinous tissue from the footprint to the retracted tendinous portion, and type III also showed a similar appearance but with obvious thinning of the tissue, without any evidence of defect confirmed on the routine outpatient ultrasonograph. Only 108 of 494 patients (21.9%) demonstrated type I healing, whereas the signs of nontendinous healing were evident for the rest, with the 116 patients (23.5%) being classified as type III with attenuation. Comparing the preoperative tendon retraction, 34.8% and 37.2% of the Patte stages 2 and 3, respectively, resulted in type III healing, which were significantly higher compared with that of stage 1 (15.3%, P < .001). Type III healing had the highest average preoperative Goutallier grades. The average postoperative visual analog scale and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores have improved significantly for all 3 groups (P < .05), with the ASES score being 86.1±15.9 for type I, 93.7±36.1 for type II, and 87.8±15.1 for type III without significant differences between the groups (P = .3). Only a fifth of the rotator cuff repairs led to a direct healing to the footprint, and the rest healed with MRI appearance of nontendinous tissue formation bridging the retracted tendinous portion and the footprint. These MRI appearances did not represent the true tendinous tissue formation between the torn end of the tendon and the bone after healing. Such appearances did not seem to affect the clinical outcomes.