Abstract

Background: De Quervain tenosynovitis is commonly seen in patients who perform repetitive wrist ulnar deviation with thumb abduction and extension. Previous studies comparing nonsurgical options have contributed to a lack of consensus about ideal management. This study's purpose was to analyze results in prospectively randomized patients treated with either corticosteroid injection (CSI) alone versus CSI with immobilization. Methods: Radial sided wrist pain, first dorsal compartment tenderness, and positive Finkelstein test were used to define De Quervain. Pain score of 4 or higher on a visual analog scale (VAS) was utilized for inclusion. Following exclusion criteria, patients underwent randomization into groups: (1) CSI alone; or (2) CSI with 3 weeks of immobilization. We followed at 3 weeks and 6 months for further evaluation, where resolution of symptoms and improvements in VAS and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores were assessed to evaluate treatment success. Results: Nine patients with CSI alone and 11 patients with CSI and immobilization were followed. At 6 months in both groups, patients experienced significant improvement in VAS and DASH scores, while 88% of patients with CSI alone and 73% of patients with CSI and immobilization experienced complete resolution of at least 2 out of 3 of their pretreatment symptoms. Between groups, outcomes were comparable except for resolution of radial-sided wrist pain, which was superior in patients with CSI alone (100% vs 64%). Conclusions: Immobilization following injection increases costs, may hinder activities of daily living, and did not contribute to improved patient outcomes in this study. Further prospective studies are warranted.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.