Abstract
Non-state armed actors (NSAAs) are individuals or groups that militarily fight for their political, economic, or social goals. Why and when would they have incentive to engage in international legal argumentation? What are the contents of the NSAAs’ legal argumentation and associated processes? What putative effects does it produce? This chapter characterizes NSAAs’ legal argumentation and presents some patterns and processes as to how NSAAs build their legal and quasi-legal arguments. The final part of the chapter discusses various putative effects NSAAs’ legal argumentation generates, in terms of persuasion, reciprocity, compliance, and potentially peace.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
