Non-reassuring fetal heart rate patterns: Is it a risk factor for long- term pediatric cardiovascular diseases of the offspring?

Abstract

ObjectiveWe aimed to study the long-term effect of non-reassuring fetal heart rate (NRFHR) patterns on the risk for subsequent pediatric cardiovascular morbidity of the offspring. Study designA population based cohort study, comparing total and different subtypes of cardiovascular morbidity related pediatric hospitalizations among offspring born by caesarean delivery (CD) due to NRFHR versus labor dystocia (failure of labor to progress during the 1st or 2nd stage). The analysis included all singletons born between the years 1999–2014 at a single tertiary regional medical center. Cardiovascular related morbidities included hospitalizations involving a pre-defined set of ICD-9 codes, as recorded in hospital computerized files. Infants with congenital malformations, multiple gestations, vaginal deliveries and vacuum failure were excluded from the analysis. Perinatal mortality cases were excluded from the long-term analysis. A Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to compare the cumulative cardiovascular morbidity incidence, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to adjust for confounders. ResultsThe study population included 9956 newborns who met inclusion criteria; among them, 5810 (58%) were born by CD due to NRFHR, and 4146 (42%) due to labor dystocia with normal FHR (comparison group). Rate of long- term cardiovascular related hospitalizations was comparable between both groups (0.8% vs. 0.7%, OR 0.9, 95% CI 0.6–1.4, p = 0.664; Kaplan-Meier survival curve p = 0.320(. Using a Cox proportional hazards model, controlling for gestational age, no association was found between NRFHR patterns and the risk for subsequent pediatric cardiovascular morbidity of the offspring (Adjusted HR = 0.8, 95% CI 0.5–1.3, p = 0.376). ConclusionIn our population, NRFHR patterns do not affect the risk of long- term pediatric cardiovascular morbidity of the offspring.