Abstract
Major uplift in imaging is evident when migration is performed with a FWI velocity model for a North Sea hydrocarbon field. However, a small but significant, systematic mismatch in travel-time remains between the field data and synthetic data predicted using the final FWI model. However we perturb the model, the source, the number of iterations, the end result invariably returns to give the same final mismatch in which the predicted data are late. We know that both the synthetic and field data contain strong water-bottom multiples, and these affect the duration, bandwidth and amplitude decay of the coda. However, the finite-difference representation of the velocity model does not contain the seabed explicitly. We propose changing the assumed density of the water layer, which changes the seabed reflection amplitudes without affecting other aspects of the data, thereby properly modelling the seabed reflectivity. The wave-train is in reality an interference pattern between several arrivals, and as the relative strength of those arrivals changes, the interference pattern changes, thereby better fitting the travel-times. We find that decreasing the density of seawater improves the fit to the field data, and that we have to reduce the density by a greater factor as offset increases.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.