Abstract
IntroductionOur main aim was to assess the level of persistence and adherence to therapy with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients in the United Kingdom (UK) and Germany, also by comparing once- (OD) with twice-a-day (BID) therapy.MethodsWe used two large retrospective datasets: a German claims dataset and the UK General Practitioner (GP)-based Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) dataset (2010–2012). All continuously insured T2DM patients with at least one outpatient/inpatient T2DM diagnosis were observed starting with the first prescription of a GLP-1 receptor agonist. Non-persistence (NP) was defined as treatment gap >90 days. Non-adherence (NA) was defined as medication possession ratio <80%, calculated during a period in which a patient continued therapy (no treatment gap >90 days) only.ResultsIn the UK sample, 1905 T2DM patients started a treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists (mean age: 55.5 years, 47.2% female). In the German sample, 1627 T2DM patients started a treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists (mean age: 56.6 years, 51.4% female). Percentage of NP patients after 12 months was 29.5% in the UK and 36.4% in the German sample. In both countries, a BID treatment was associated with a higher probability to discontinue a treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists earlier than an OD treatment (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.431 in UK and HR = 1.314 in Germany). The percentages of patients considered NA were 20.2%/20.0%/20.5% (all/OD/BID) for the UK sample, and 19.9%/19.2%/21.8% (all/OD/BID) for the German sample.ConclusionNP and NA to treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists in both UK and Germany appear to be similar. Persistence to OD treatment is higher than to BID treatment in both the UK and Germany.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-015-0149-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Highlights
Our main aim was to assess the level of persistence and adherence to therapy with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients in the United Kingdom (UK) and Germany, by comparing once- (OD) with twice-a-day (BID) therapy.Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.S
In the UK sample, 1905 T2DM patients started a treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists
In the German sample, 1627 T2DM patients started a treatment with GLP-1 receptor agonists
Summary
Our main aim was to assess the level of persistence and adherence to therapy with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients in the United Kingdom (UK) and Germany, by comparing once- (OD) with twice-a-day (BID) therapy.Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s13300-015-0149-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.S. Our main aim was to assess the level of persistence and adherence to therapy with glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients in the United Kingdom (UK) and Germany, by comparing once- (OD) with twice-a-day (BID) therapy. Kingdom (UK), there are currently six GLP-1 receptor agonists available, twice-daily (BID). Despite the number and variety of available T2DM treatment options, it is known from several real-world studies that reaching target glucose levels remains a challenge for many patients [8,9,10]. Much less is known about the level of persistence/adherence to therapy with GLP-1 receptor agonists. There is limited real-world data from European T2DM patients about the persistence and adherence to therapy with GLP-1 receptor agonists
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.