Abstract

The Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), which permeates the entire Universe, is the radiation left over from just 380,000 years after the Big Bang. On very large scales, the CMB radiation field is smooth and isotropic, but the existence of structure in the Universe - stars, galaxies, clusters of galaxies - suggests that the field should fluctuate on smaller scales. Recent observations, from the Cosmic Microwave Background Explorer to the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Project, have strikingly confirmed this prediction. CMB fluctuations provide clues to the Universe's structure and composition shortly after the Big Bang that are critical for testing cosmological models. For example, CMB data can be used to determine what portion of the Universe is composed of ordinary matter versus the mysterious dark matter and dark energy. To this end, cosmologists usually summarize the fluctuations by the power spectrum, which gives the variance as a function of angular frequency. The spectrum's shape, and in particular the location and height of its peaks, relates directly to the parameters in the cosmological models. Thus, a critical statistical question is how accurately can these peaks be estimated. We use recently developed techniques to construct a nonparametric confidence set for the unknown CMB spectrum. Our estimated spectrum, based on minimal assumptions, closely matches the model-based estimates used by cosmologists, but we can make a wide range of additional inferences. We apply these techniques to test various models and to extract confidence intervals on cosmological parameters of interest. Our analysis shows that, even without parametric assumptions, the first peak is resolved accurately with current data but that the second and third peaks are not.

Highlights

  • The “Big Bang” model is misnamed, as one might expect when a term is coined as an insult

  • We applied our method to the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) data to obtain a confidence set for the unknown spectrum f ( /Lmax) ≡ C

  • Our most striking finding is that the center of our nonparametric confidence ball using the WMAP data alone lies very close to the Concordance model fit over the range where the data are not noise dominated

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The “Big Bang” model is misnamed, as one might expect when a term is coined as an insult. The name Big Bang stuck, as did its evocation of a mighty explosion in space. The image of an explosion is highly misleading. What the model posits is that the Universe began hot, dense and expanding. The density during that second was high enough to stop neutrinos, which interact so weakly with matter that they can pass unmolested through a quadrillion kilometers of lead. What ties this hot, dense beginning to the Universe we see today is expansion. A useful metaphor for the expanding Universe is the surface of an inflating balloon. If you picture a wave oscillating over the surface of the balloon, the wavelength increases.

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.