Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to provide a comparative study of non-monotonic syntax-based consequence relations, from different points of view. Starting from a (not necessarily consistent) belief base E and a pre-ordering on E, we first remind different mechanisms for selecting preferred consistent subbases in syntax-based approaches. Then, we present three entailment principles in order to cope with these multiple subbases. The crossing point of each generation mechanism and each principle defines a syntax-based consequence relation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
