Abstract

Relationships that have not been formalized by marriage but that function like marriage are increasingly common among couples. Many of these relationships involve children who are related to only one of the adults but who have established parent‐child relationships with both adults. This raises questions about how best to preserve children's attachment relationships in the event that the adult relationship dissolves. Recent scholarship advocates two distinct approaches: some argue for legal recognition of expansive definitions of the family whereas others advocate for legal recognition of children's rights. This research examines the efficacy of these competing arguments. Findings suggest that judicial recognition of family definitions is not, on its own, enough to protect nonbiological attachments. Instead, family definitions must also be combined with a focus on children's rights. The legal and policy implications of these findings are discussed.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call