Abstract

In the so called crypto-Hermitian formulation of quantum theory (incorporating, in particular, the -symmetric quantum mechanics as its special case) the unitary evolution of a system is known to be described via an apparently redundant representation of the states in a triplet of Hilbert spaces. Two of them are unitarily equivalent while the auxiliary, zeroth one is unphysical but exceptionally user-friendly. The dynamical evolution equations are, naturally, solved in the friendliest space . The evaluation of experimental predictions then requires a Hermitization of the observables. This yields, as its byproduct, the correct physical Hilbert space . The formalism offers the conventional probabilistic interpretation due to the Dyson-proposed unitary equivalence between and a certain conventional but prohibitively complicated textbook space . The key merit of the innovation lies in its enhanced flexibility opening new ways towards nonlocal or complex-interaction unitary models. The price to pay is that the ad hoc inner product in the relevant physical Hilbert space is, by construction, Hamiltonian-dependent. We show that this implies that the Rayleigh-Schrödinger perturbation theory must be used with due care. The warning is supported by an elementary sample of quantum system near its exceptional-point phase transition. In contrast to a naive expectation, the model proves stable with respect to the admissible, self-consistently specified (i.e., physical) small perturbations.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call