Abstract

This study includes an investigation of using a cellular raft over piles on the seismic response of both a twisting and regular tower using the direct method, demonstrating the variance between a solid raft and a cellular raft. Both towers are 52 stories high and made of reinforced concrete. They were also built on a reinforced concrete piled-raft foundation. The soil model is thought to be multi-layered and has the same profile as the zone under investigation (New Mansoura, Egypt). All structural properties (dimensions, section properties, materials) are equal to allow a fair comparison of output response for both towers. The sole difference between the two towers is their elevation. The study is carried out under seismic loads using nonlinear time-history analysis. All analyses are carried out employing finite-element software (Midas GTS NX). Thus, seven distinct earthquake records with full 3D models were used for time-history research. According to the findings and discussions, it is concluded that adopting a cellular raft can reduce the dynamic response of the towers. Considering the soil–structure interaction, the maximum inter-story drift ratio decreases by 8.17% for the twisting tower and 5.58% for the regular tower while using the cellular raft. Furthermore, the regular tower is more effective than the twisting tower at resisting lateral loads.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call