Abstract

This paper demonstrates the effect of incorporating distributed plasticity in nonlinear analytical models used to assess the potential for progressive collapse of steel framed regular building structures. Emphasis on this paper is on the deformation response under the notionally removed column, in a typical Alternate Path (AP) method. The AP method employed in this paper is based on the provisions of the Unified Facilities Criteria – Design of Buildings to Resist Progressive Collapse , developed and updated by the U.S. Department of Defense [1]. The AP method is often used for to assess the potential for progressive collapse of building structures that fall under Occupancy Category III or IV. A case study steel building is used to examine the effect of incorporating distributed plasticity, where moment frames were used on perimeter as well as the interior of the three dimensional structural system. It is concluded that the use of moment resisting frames within the structural system will enhance resistance to progressive collapse through ductile deformation response and that it is conserative to ignore the effects of distributed plasticity in determining peak displacement response under the notionally removed column.

Highlights

  • Progressive collapse of building structures is not covered extensively in international building codes and design standards

  • A building structure is assessed for progressive collapse potential, after it is designed in accordance with the applicable building code

  • Analysis of the structural system with column D2 removed produced the deformed shape shown in Fig. 4 and the maximum vertical deformation response reaches 1934.6 mm

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Progressive collapse of building structures is not covered extensively in international building codes and design standards. The current UFC guide [1] embraces the design philosophy that that progressive collapse resistant steel structures are ductile systems, similar in some ways to earthquake resistant structural systems, when certain types of moment resisting connections are used [3]. This paper outlines the application of the AP method to assess the capacity of steel structural systems to transmit gravity load, following the loss of a primary load carrying member in a framed steel structural system using nonlinear static analysis procedures. The application of the AP method using Linear Static Analysis (LSA) procedures is permitted for structures that do not contain significant irregularities or if the demand-to-capacity ratio (DCR) is less than 2.0. The current paper employs NSA to assess the potential for progressive collapse of steel framed structures and addressed the effect of ignoring distributed plasticity on deformation response

Nonlinear static analysis procedure and the alternate path method
Dynamic increase factor
Acceptance criteria
Case study
Distributed plasticity
Summary
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call