Abstract
AbstractWe study the nonlinear limits to arbitrage in a model. When mispricing is small, arbitrage activity increases with mispricing because of the higher cost‐adjusted return. However, at high levels of mispricing, arbitrageurs are deterred by larger mispricing as funding constraints become more binding. Testing the model predictions on the index spot‐futures arbitrage with a Markov‐switching model, we document an inverse U‐shaped relationship between mispricing and arbitrage activity. The extreme regime is with the largest mispricing but least arbitrage activity, and coincides with the market turmoil, suggesting that funding constraints become the main driver behind the limit to arbitrage.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
