Abstract
nor do we assume more smoothness than mere continuity of g(x, t) in t. In particular, no assumption concerning the modulus of continuity of g(x, t) in I is made. Castro and Lazer [l] studied (0.1) under the assumptions that A, < A’ 5 g(x, tyt I A” < A/+, and ag(x, t)/& is increasing in It I. Ambrosetti and Mancini [2] consider the situation when g(x, t) = &r + J-(x, r) with f(x, f) uniformly bounded. Thews [3) assumed (1J + h,(x, f))/f 5 g(x, t)/t 5 (&+it hz(x, t))/t where the hi are bounded and satisfy
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
