Nonlinear control designs and their application to cancer differentiation therapy

Abstract

We designed three new controllers: a sigmoid-based controller, a polynomial dynamic inversion-based controller, and a proportional–integral–derivative (PID) impulsive controller for cancer differentiation therapy. We compared these three controllers to existing control strategies to show the improvement in performance and compare their robustness. The sigmoid-based controller adds a sigmoid term associated with the error of the controlled state and a selected observed state. The sigmoid term is multiplied by a control gain, thereby decreasing the control effort for state transition. The polynomial dynamic inversion-based controller adds a cubic error term in the error dynamic aiming to achieve a shorter convergence time to the desired value of the controlled state. The PID impulsive controller considers the accumulated controlled state error and the rate of change of the controlled state error, thereby forcing the controlled state to converge to the desired value and alleviating the damping effect in the steady state. For the considered cancer network, the 3 new cancer control strategies exhibit superior and robust performance. The PID impulsive controller has a significant improvement in robustness compared to the impulsive controller and has greater potential for cancer differentiation therapy.