Abstract
Despite endoscopy's gold standard status, non-invasive tools are revolutionizing Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) management. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the diagnostic accuracy of biochemical markers, intestinal ultrasound (US), and endoscopy in adults with IBD. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of fecal calprotectin, C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), and bowel wall thickness measured by US with endoscopy in IBD patients. We searched electronic databases for most recent studies published between 2012 and 2023, identifying 25 studies comparing at least one non-invasive tool with endoscopy. We pooled sensitivity and specificity for relevant outcomes and conducted subgroup analyses to explore heterogeneity. 25 studies (n=5872 patients) met inclusion criteria. Fecal calprotectin emerged as a powerful diagnostic tool, with pooled sensitivity of 92.5% and specificity of 85.1% for IBD. But it’s performance was less consistent in differentiating active vs. inactive disease and predicting flares. Intestinal US proved reliable for diagnosis, particularly in Crohn's disease (pooled sensitivity 86.3%, specificity 78.9%), and showed promise in assessing activity and predicting treatment response. C-Reactive Protein and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, though less accurate, provided additional information about disease status. Combining calprotectin and US further enhanced prediction accuracy, while decision tree analysis incorporating clinical data and both tools maximized prediction in ulcerative colitis. Non-invasive tools offer invaluable insights for IBD management, complementing and potentially reducing reliance on endoscopy. Standardizing methodologies and developing more specific markers, potentially aided by AI, holds immense potential for personalized, effective IBD care. This evolving landscape paves the way for a future where patients actively participate in their journey, empowered by the growing arsenal of non-invasive tools.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: World Journal of Biology Pharmacy and Health Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.