Non-invasive Systemic Drug Delivery: Developability Considerations for Alternate Routes of Administration

Abstract

Over the past few decades alternate routes of administration have gained significant momentum and attention, to complement approved drug products, or enable those that cannot be delivered by the oral or parenteral route. Intranasal, buccal/sublingual, pulmonary, and transdermal routes being the most promising non-invasive systemic delivery options. Considering alternate routes of administration early in the development process may be useful to enable new molecular entities (NME) that have deficiencies (extensive first-pass metabolism, unfavorable physicochemical properties, gastro-intestinal adverse effects) or suboptimal pharmacokinetic profiles that are identified in preclinical studies. This review article describes the various delivery considerations and extraneous factors in developing a strategy to pursue an alternate route of administration for systemic delivery. The various delivery route options are outlined with their pros and cons; key criteria and physicochemical attributes that would make a drug a suitable candidate are discussed; approaches to assess delivery feasibility, toxicity at the site of delivery, and overall developability potential are described; and lastly, product trends and their disease implications are highlighted to underscore treatment precedence that help to build scientific rationale for the pursuit of an alternate route of administration. © 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc. and the American Pharmacists Association J Pharm Sci 99:1–20, 2010