Abstract
Bubble sizes measured in a column of diameter 290 mm with FCC particles utilizing both an intrusive optical probe and non-intrusive pressure analysis are compared. The pressure signals were decoupled by differential pressure analysis and incoherence analysis. It is shown that pressure fluctuations induced by jetting/bubble formation can be effectively filtered out by differential pressure and incoherence analysis. The differential pressure signals measured across a vertical interval less than half the maximum bubble size unreasonably damps the power spectral density intensity, leading to underestimation of bubble size and overestimation of mean frequency. In the present work, the incoherence analysis tends to estimate greater bubble size than differential pressure analysis. Bubble chord lengths are overestimated by optical probe signals because small bubbles are not detected. Bubble sizes calculated by the equation of Horio and Nonaka (1987) agree reasonably well with that estimated by incoherence analysis at relatively high superficial gas velocities.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
