Abstract

We construct an example of a non-hyperbolic singular projective surface X whose normalization V is the square of a genus 3 C and hence, hyperbolic. Let C be a smooth irreducible projective of genus g > 2. Then the smooth projective surface V = C x C is Kobayashi hyperbolic, that is, the Kobayashi pseudodistance on it is a distance [2]. Let V ___ pN be a projective embedding. Consider a generic projection ir V __ p3. By Bertini's theorem, the singular locus S (i.e. the closure of the set of points) of the image surface X = ir(V) c is an irreducible curve, and ir: V -* X is a normalization map (see [4]). The question arises whether the surface X is also hyperbolic. The answer is positive [5], and hence by the stability of hyperbolicity theorem [6], any (smooth) surface X' in I3 close enough to X is hyperbolic, as well. In that way examples of degree 32 smooth hyperbolic surfaces in p3 were produced [5]. By Proposition 1.1 in [5], hyperbolicity of a (singular) surface X as above is equivalent to hyperbolicity of its S. Actually, in [5] it is shown that the geometric genus of the S is > 225, which provides that X is hyperbolic. On the other hand, by the Kobayashi-Kwack theorem [2, 3], a normalization of a hyperbolic complex space is also hyperbolic. In this note we give an example which shows that in general, the converse is not true. To describe this example, denote by C the Fermat quartic x4 + y4 + z4 0 O in P2. Then the Cartesian square V = C X C C Ip2 X Ip2 c-_ p8 (the Segre embedding) is a smooth surface of degree 32 in Ip8. We construct a singular projective surface X whose normalization is V, which has a fibration X -* C over C with general fibre isomorphic to C and with four degenerate fibres Ci, i = 1, . . ., 4, isomorphic to Pl1. The double curve S = Cl U ... U C4 C X of X is neither irreducible nor hyperbolic, in contrast with the situation studied in [5]. Thus, the assumption in [5] that the projection ir is generic, is likely to be essential to provide hyperbolicity of the image surface X = 7r(V). Actually, in our example the surface X does not appear as a projection of V = C x C; but it has a natural embedding into a four-dimensional Brauer-Severi variety Y (see [1]) which is a smooth projective fiber bundle over Ip2 with general fibre Ip2. Received by the editors July 30, 1999. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 32H15, 32H20. (?2000 American Mathematical Society

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call