Abstract
Along sandy coastlines, submerged, shore-parallel sandbars play an essential role in shoreline morphology by dissipating wave energy through depth-induced wave breaking. While wave breaking and sediment transport around sandbars are complex three-dimensional (3D) processes, shoreline morphology is typically simulated with depth-averaged models that feature lower computational demand than do 3D models. In this context, this study examines the implications of depth-averaging the flow field and approximating the breaking process in nonhydrostatic models (e.g., XBeach nonhydrostatic) for the hydro- and morphodynamic processes around sandbars. The implications are drawn based on reproducing large-scale experiments of a barred beach profile using the single-layer (XBNH) and the reduced two-layer (XBNH+) modes of XBeach. While hydrodynamic processes were predicted with high accuracy on the sandbar’s seaward side, wave heights were overpredicted on the bar’s landward side. The overestimation was due to the simplified reproduction of the complex breaking process near the sandbar’s peak, particularly in terms of the generated turbulence in the water column. Moreover, the velocity profile with a strong undertow could only be represented in a simplified way even using the two-layer mode XBNH+, thus resulting in inaccurate predictions of sediment loads around the sandbar. A parametric study is performed, and it revealed which model parameters control the simulation of the wave-breaking process. Thus, wave height predictions could be improved by tuning the energy-dissipation parameters. However, flow velocities and morphodynamic predictions could not be improved accordingly. Thus, this study identifies possible hydrodynamic model improvements, such as incorporating a roller dissipation model. Moreover, it improves understanding of key drivers and processes that should be included in nonhydrostatic depth-averaged models to simulate morphological changes around sandbars more efficiently.
Highlights
Coastal zones are attractive locations for tourism, recreation, economic activities, and global trade exchange (Sardain et al 2019).global warming and sea-level rise stress many coastal ecosystems by intensifying coastal erosion and flooding events (Elsayed and Oumeraci 2016; Nguyen et al 2020)
This study examined the effect of 2D nonhydrostatic model assumptions and simplifications on the hydro- and morphodynamic processes around sandbars
The XBeach modes XBNH of a single water layer and XBNH+ of reduced two-water layers were used as tools for the latter purpose
Summary
Coastal zones are attractive locations for tourism, recreation, economic activities, and global trade exchange (Sardain et al 2019).global warming and sea-level rise stress many coastal ecosystems by intensifying coastal erosion and flooding events (Elsayed and Oumeraci 2016; Nguyen et al 2020). Sandbars dissipate wave energy through depth-induced wave breaking and reduce wave period through nonlinear dispersive wave transformation in the surf zone (Cohn et al 2014; Kuznetsova and Saprykina 2019; Mulligan et al 2019). They influence cross-shore sediment transport processes, affect the shoreline position, and mitigate coastal erosion (Eichentopf et al 2019; Vidal-Ruiz and de Alegria-Arzaburu 2019; Xie et al 2017). Sandbars reduce the overtopping rates over coastal structures during storm events (Cohn and Ruggiero 2016; Kuznetsova and Saprykina 2019; van der Meer et al 2018; Rutten et al 2021)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal, and Ocean Engineering
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.