Abstract

Information comparing treatment outcome for diffuse large Bcell (DLBCL) and follicular (FL) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients treated with schemes with and without rituximab from low- and middle-income countries is scarce. Clinical characteristics, response to therapy and long-term outcome of DLBCL and FL patients were studied. Patients with DLBCL and FL diagnosed over 8years at a reference center in northeast Mexico were included. Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Cox regression model was used to evaluate the association between risk factors, rituximab therapy and clinical outcome. One hundred-sixteen patients with DLBCL and 65 with FL in advanced stages were included. Median age was 57.8 and 56years, respectively. Clinical characteristics between groups receiving or not receiving rituximab were comparable. Stages III and IV were found in 63.8% of DLBCL and 84.6% in FL patients, respectively. OS and PFS at 60months were 63.8 and 51.2% in DLBCL and 70.6 and 33.8% in FL. No difference in OS was found in DLBCL and FL when rituximab-based regimens vs. non rituximab-based regimens were compared, but a statistically significant difference was documented in PFS in FL patients. Addition of rituximab to CHOP-like regimens did not improve OS in DLBCL and FL NHL subtypes. In comparison to developed countries, diagnosis of NHL was made a decade earlier and in advanced clinical stages. Cost-efficiency of adding rituximab to therapy for these patients should be assessed.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.