Abstract

IntroductionNonfocal transient neurological attacks (TNAs) are associated with an increased risk of future dementia, but it is unclear whether TNAs are also associated with concurrent cognitive impairment. We hypothesized that recent TNAs are related to worse cognitive functioning. We tested our hypothesis in patients with heart failure, as these patients are at risk of cerebral hypoperfusion, which might play a role in the etiology of TNAs.MethodsWe performed neuropsychological testing in all patients with heart failure enrolled in the Heart Brain Connection study. We assessed global cognition, attention-psychomotor speed, executive functioning, memory and language. All patients were interviewed with a standardized questionnaire on the occurrence of TNAs in the preceding 6 months. We studied associations between TNAs and cognitive functioning with linear and logistic regression analyses, adjusted for age, sex and education. We performed additional analyses in patients without previous stroke or TIA and in patients without brain infarction on MRI.ResultsThirty-seven (23%) of 158 patients (mean age 70 years, 67% men) experienced one or more TNAs. Patients with a recent TNA were more likely to be impaired on ≥ 1 cognitive domains than patients without TNAs [41% vs. 18%, adjusted odds ratio 4.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.8–11.8]. Patients with TNAs performed worse than patients without TNAs on global cognition (mean difference in z scores − 0.36, 95% CI − 0.54 to − 0.18), and on the cognitive domains attention-psychomotor speed (mean difference − 0.40, 95% CI − 0.66 to − 0.14), memory (mean difference − 0.57, 95% CI − 0.98 to − 0.15) and language (mean difference − 0.47, 95% CI − 0.79 to − 0.16). These associations were independent of cardiac output and volume of white matter hyperintensities. Subgroup analyses in patients without previous stroke or TIA or brain infarction on MRI (n = 78) yielded comparable results, with the exception of the cognitive domain language, which was no longer different between patients with and without TNAs.ConclusionAmong patients with heart failure, TNAs are associated with cognitive impairment, which warrants the need for more clinical awareness of this problem.

Highlights

  • Nonfocal transient neurological attacks (TNAs) are associated with an increased risk of future dementia, but it is unclear whether TNAs are associated with concurrent cognitive impairment

  • Patients with TNAs more often had a history of transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) than patients without TNAs (P = 0.025)

  • Cardiac output, left ventricular ejection fraction, duration of heart failure and NYHA classification did not differ between patients with and without TNAs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Nonfocal transient neurological attacks (TNAs) are associated with an increased risk of future dementia, but it is unclear whether TNAs are associated with concurrent cognitive impairment. Patients with TNAs performed worse than patients without TNAs on global cognition (mean difference in z scores − 0.36, 95% CI − 0.54 to − 0.18), and on the cognitive domains attentionpsychomotor speed (mean difference − 0.40, 95% CI − 0.66 to − 0.14), memory (mean difference − 0.57, 95% CI − 0.98 to − 0.15) and language (mean difference − 0.47, 95% CI − 0.79 to − 0.16) These associations were independent of cardiac output and volume of white matter hyperintensities. Subgroup analyses in patients without previous stroke or TIA or brain infarction on MRI (n = 78) yielded comparable results, with the exception of the cognitive domain language, which was no longer different between patients with and without TNAs. Conclusion Among patients with heart failure, TNAs are associated with cognitive impairment, which warrants the need for more clinical awareness of this problem. We performed additional analyses in patients without a history of stroke or TIA, and in patients without brain infarction on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as these factors may independently influence cognitive functioning

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.