Abstract

Jellium, a simple model of metals, is a standard testing ground for density functionals both for bulk and for surface properties. Earlier tests show that the Tao--Perdew--Staroverov--Scuseria (TPSS) nonempirical metageneralized gradient approximation (meta-GGA) for the exchange-correlation energy yields more accurate surface energies than the local spin density (LSD) approximation for spin-unpolarized jellium. In this study, work functions and surface energies of a jellium metal in the presence of ``internal'' and external magnetic fields are calculated with LSD, Perdew--Burke--Ernzerhof (PBE) GGA, and TPSS meta-GGA and its predecessor, the nearly nonempirical Perdew--Kurth--Zupan--Blaha meta-GGA, using self-consistent LSD orbitals and densities. The results show that (i) For normal bulk densities, the surface correlation energy is the same in TPSS as in PBE, as it should be since TPSS strives to represent a self-correlation correction to PBE; (ii) Normal surface density profiles can be scaled uniformly to the low-density or strong-interaction limit, and TPSS provides an estimate for that limit that is consistent with (but probably more accurate than) other estimates; (iii) For both normal and low densities, TPSS provides the same description of surface magnetism as PBE, suggesting that these approximations may be generally equivalent for magnetism. The energies of jellium spheres with up to 106 electrons are calculated using density functionals and compared to those obtained with diffusion quantum Monte Carlo data, including our estimate for the fixed-node correction. Typically, while PBE energies are too low for spheres with more than about two electrons, LSD and TPSS are accurate there. We confirm that curvature energies are lower in PBE and TPSS than in LSD. Finally, we calculate the linear response of bulk jellium using these density functionals and find that not only LSD but also PBE GGA and TPSS meta-GGA yield a linear response in good agreement with that of the quantum Monte Carlo method, for wave vectors of the perturbing external potential up to twice the Fermi wave vector.

Highlights

  • Jellium is a simple model of metals

  • Earlier tests show that the Tao–Perdew–Staroverov–ScuseriaTPSSnonempirical metageneralized gradient approximationmeta-GGAfor the exchange-correlation energy yields more accurate surface energies than the local spin densityLSDapproximation for spin-unpolarized jellium

  • The results show thati For normal bulk densities, the surface correlation energy is the same in TPSS as in PBE, as it should be since TPSS strives to represent a self-correlation correction to PBE; ͑ii Normal surface density profiles can be scaled uniformly to the low-density or strong-interaction limit, and TPSS provides an estimate for that limit that is consistent withbut probably more accurate thanother estimates; ͑iii For both normal and low densities, TPSS provides the same description of surface magnetism as PBE, suggesting that these approximations may be generally equivalent for magnetism

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Jellium is a simple model of metals. The surface properties of jellium can emulate those of real surfaces. PKZB produces too-long bond lengths and some inaccurate properties of hydrogenbonded complexes.19,25,26 These failures may be attributed to the unbalanced description of PKZB exchange and correlation for slowly varying densities and one- or two-electron densities, which are the paradigms in condensed matter physics and in quantum chemistry, respectively. We first scale to the low-density limit and there require the exchange-correlation energy to be correctly independent of spin for a model uniformly spin-polarized one-electron Gaussian density with constant relative spin polarization in the range of 0 Յ␨͉ Շ 0.7, like LSD and PBE and unlike PKZB. Since TPSS successfully improves on LSD for spin-unpolarized jellium and has the proper spin dependence, we estimate the surface exchange-correlation energy and work function with the TPSS meta-GGA functional for a spin-polarized jellium in magnetic fields. The other tests considered here are the jellium sphereswhich sample the surface and curvature energyand the linear response of the bulk jellium

DENSITY FUNCTIONAL APPROXIMATIONS
SPIN-POLARIZED JELLIUM AND KOHN–SHAM APPROACH
SURFACE ENERGIES OF SPIN-POLARIZED JELLIUM
Spin dependence of PBE GGA and TPSS meta-GGA
INFINITE BARRIER MODEL OF THE JELLIUM SURFACE
ENERGIES OF JELLIUM SPHERES
LINEAR DENSITY RESPONSE AND CHARGE DENSITY WAVES
VIII. CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call