Abstract

Non-echoplanar diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) has established itself as the modality of choice in detecting and localising post-operative middle ear cleft cholesteatoma. Despite its good diagnostic performance, there are recognised pitfalls in its radiological interpretation which both the radiologist and otologist should be aware of. Our article highlights the various pitfalls and provides guidance for improving radiological interpretation and navigating beyond many of the pitfalls. It is recommended radiological practice to interpret the diffusion weighted images together with the ADC map and supplement with the corresponding T1 weighted and T2 weighted images, all of which can contribute to and enhance lesion localisation and characterisation. ADC values are also helpful in improving specificity and confidence levels. Given the limitation in sensitivity in detecting small cholesteatoma less than 3 mm, serial monitoring with DWI over time is recommended to allow any small residual cholesteatoma pearls to grow and become large enough to be detected on DWI. Optimising image acquisition and discussing at a joint clinico-radiological meeting both foster good radiological interpretation to navigate beyond the pitfalls and ultimately good patient care.Teaching Points• Non-echoplanar DWI is the imaging of choice in detecting post-operative cholesteatoma.• There are recognised pitfalls which may hinder accurate radiological interpretation.• Interpret with the ADC map /values and T1W and T2W images.• Serial DWI monitoring is of value in detection and characterisation.• Optimising image acquisition and discussing at clinico-radiological meetings enhance radiological interpretation.

Highlights

  • Since it was first described in 2006 for the detection of cholesteatoma [1, 2], non-echoplanar diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) has firmly established its role as the imaging modality of choice in detecting post-operative cholesteatoma [3,4,5,6,7]

  • Nonechoplanar DWI is capable of acquiring thin slices and generating a high resolution matrix, and can detect cholesteatoma as small as 2 mm [3,4,5]

  • There are many studies to date that have evaluated the performance of non-echoplanar DWI in detecting postoperative cholesteatoma [2, 8, 12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23, 25, 29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]

Read more

Summary

PICTORIAL REVIEW

Non-echoplanar diffusion weighted imaging in the detection of post-operative middle ear cholesteatoma: navigating beyond the pitfalls to find the pearl. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com

Introduction
Optimisation of technique
Quantitative assessment with ADC values
Pitfalls in sensitivity
Navigating past the pitfalls in sensitivity
Pitfalls in specificity
Navigating past the pitfalls in specificity
Conclusion
Use of DWI following canal wall down surgery
Findings
Use of DWI in children
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call