“Nondirectivity” in the theory of Carl R. Rogers: An unprecedented premise

Abstract

The unprecedented premise of the self-authority and self-determination of the person is that of the therapist's nondirective attitude. The dedication of Rogers to the value laden concept of nondirectivity throughout his life is reviewed. In Rogers' theory, the client is the director of her/his own life when facilitated through a psychological environment characterized by the congruent therapist experiencing of unconditional positive regard and empathy towards the client. Nondirectivity refers to the therapist's actions, attitudes, and demeanor that maximize the opportunity for the client/participant to direct her/his own life. The misunderstandings of nondirectivity lie within the interface with the deviations from Rogers' theory, the conventional mental health treatment model, and the characterization of Rogers' theory as a form of response repertoire. Those who disagree with the nondirective value laden principle of the theory disagree with the foundational value of Rogers' theory, a value that represents a different paradigm.