Abstract

The crashworthiness of thin-walled tubes with various designs under axial compression has been extensively investigated. Despite this, the parameters that govern the performance of tubes and can be applied across different cross-sectional topologies have not hitherto been available. In this paper, twenty types of thin-walled tubes with different cross-sectional shapes (e.g., multi-celled, bi-tubular, and hierarchical square, hexagonal and circular tubes) have been numerically simulated and theoretically analysed. All the tubes are made from identical material and possess identical apparent cross-sectional area, height and mass. Six indicators are employed to characterise the crashworthiness performance of the tubes. Two novel non-dimensional indices, the geometric complexity index (RG) which is the ratio of the total length of solid segments in the cross-section of a tube to that of the square tube, and the topological index (RT) which is the non-dimensional coefficient in the expression of plastic energy dissipation closely related to the types and numbers of the wall junctions in cross-section, are identified for the first time. Both the indices RG and RT are used in a regression analysis of the indicators that characterise the crashworthiness of the tubes. The results reveal that the crashworthiness indicators of the tubes, the mean crushing force (MCF), the specific energy absorption (SEA) and the effectiveness of energy absorption (EEA) do not exclusively vary with RG. Instead, MCF, SEA and EEA are all properly fitted by linear relations with a single non-dimensional parameter ω, which is a simple function of RG and RT, i.e., ω=RT/RG. Increasing the magnitude of ω ultimately improves the crashworthiness of tubes, including enhanced specific energy absorption, effectiveness of energy absorption and crushing force efficiency, while reducing the force fluctuation during the crushing process. Of the tubes studied, the edge-based hierarchical circular tube (EH_C) has the highest SEA of 22.17 J/g, which is 133%, 60% and 41% larger than that of single-celled square, hexagonal and circular tubes, respectively.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.