Abstract

Different non-destructive testing techniques have been evaluated for detecting and assessing damage in carbon fiber reinforced plastics: (i) ultrasonic C-scan, (ii) local defect resonance of front/back surface and (iii) lock-in infrared thermography in reflection. Both artificial defects (flat bottom holes and inserts) and impact damage (barely visible impact damage) have been considered. The ultrasonic C-scans in reflection shows good performance in detecting the defects and in assessing actual defect parameters (e.g., size and depth), but it requires long scanning procedures and water coupling. The local defect resonance technique shows acceptable defect detectability, but has difficulty in extracting actual defect parameters without a priori knowledge. The thermographic inspection is by far the fastest technique, and shows good detectability of shallow defects (depth < 2 mm). Lateral sizing of shallow damage is also possible. The inspection of deeper defects (depth > 3–4 mm) in reflection is problematic and requires advanced post-processing approaches in order to improve the defect contrast to detectable limits.

Highlights

  • Fiber reinforced plastics are widely used in many advanced engineering structures because of their high specific stiffness and strength

  • Note that we have put the word peakpicking between quotation marks because in reality the Local defect resonance (LDR) is often not associated with a peak in the average frequency response function (FRF)

  • The frequency band data FBD over 50–100 kHz is shown in Figure 3e and clearly reveals the location of defect

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Fiber reinforced plastics (or composites) are widely used in many advanced engineering structures because of their high specific stiffness and strength. A major drawback of composites is their sensitivity to internal damage features. Laminates, a small impact event could lead to large internal delaminations affecting the structural integrity [1]. To assure the structural performance of composite components, several non-destructive testing (NDT) techniques have been developed and implemented over the last decades [2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. Each of these NDT techniques has its advantages, but has its disadvantages, and even its limitations.

Ultrasonic C-Scan
Local Defect Resonance
Infrared Thermography
Materials
Flat Bottom Hole—CFRPFBH
ETFE Insert—CFRPINSERT
Barely Visible Impact Damage—CFRPBVID
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.