Abstract
The different approaches for separating residual stress and composition gradients introduced in the first part of this series [Klaus & Genzel (2017). J. Appl. Cryst. 50, 252–264] are demonstrated with the experimental example of a graded Ti(C,N) coating layer deposited by a modified high-temperature chemical vapour deposition process on a cemented carbide substrate. The coating layer features a depth gradient in the lattice parameter d_{\psi ^*}^{hkl} in the strain-free direction of the biaxial stress state, ψ*,hkl , and tensile residual stresses σ|| which are nearly uniform over the coating thickness but drop down significantly towards the free surface. On the assumption that the out-of-plane stress component σ33 can be neglected, the d_{\psi ^*}^{hkl} gradient is related to the variation in the chemical composition with depth. Therefore, the example considered here corresponds to case (d) of possible combinations of residual stress and composition gradients discussed in the first part of this series. The comparison of the results achieved by means of the different methods reveals the importance of choosing appropriate experimental conditions that fit best to the sample to be investigated. For the case of thin-film analysis, it is shown that the X-ray information depth is the crucial parameter which should match the film thickness.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.