Abstract
Hydropower producers rely on stochastic optimization when scheduling their resources over long periods of time. Due to its computational complexity, the optimization problem is normally cast as a stochastic linear program. In a future power market with more volatile power prices, it becomes increasingly important to capture parts of the hydropower operational characteristics that are not easily linearized, e.g., unit commitment and nonconvex generation curves. Stochastic dual dynamic programming (SDDP) is a state-of-the-art algorithm for long- and medium-term hydropower scheduling with a linear problem formulation. A recently proposed extension of the SDDP method known as stochastic dual dynamic integer programming (SDDiP) has proven convergence also in the nonconvex case. We apply the SDDiP algorithm to the medium-term hydropower scheduling (MTHS) problem and elaborate on how to incorporate stagewise-dependent stochastic variables on the right-hand sides and the objective of the optimization problem. Finally, we demonstrate the capability of the SDDiP algorithm on a case study for a Norwegian hydropower producer. The case study demonstrates that it is possible but time-consuming to solve the MTHS problem to optimality. However, the case study shows that a new type of cut, known as strengthened Benders cut, significantly contributes to close the optimality gap compared to classical Benders cuts.
Highlights
T HE hydropower scheduling problem is difficult given its stochastic and multistage nature, and a variety of different solution techniques have been applied to it, see e.g. [1], [2]
We found that the integer cuts are not very computationally efficient compared to solution improvement when applied for the given case study
The strengthened Benders cut significantly improves solution quality compared to ordinary Benders cuts with only a modest increase in computational
Summary
T HE hydropower scheduling problem is difficult given its stochastic and multistage nature, and a variety of different solution techniques have been applied to it, see e.g. [1], [2]. Milton Stewart School of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA He is a Research Scientist at Amazon Web Services. There are other types of nonconvexities that occur in the MTHS problem, such as the generation-discharge function that is dependent on the water head, discharge from multiple reservoirs to one power station and other topological constraints in the hydropower system. These nonconvexities should be represented in the ST operative models and in the MTHS models that provide the expected opportunity cost of water to them
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.