Abstract

Hydropower producers rely on stochastic optimization when scheduling their resources over long periods of time. Due to its computational complexity, the optimization problem is normally cast as a stochastic linear program. In a future power market with more volatile power prices, it becomes increasingly important to capture parts of the hydropower operational characteristics that are not easily linearized, e.g., unit commitment and nonconvex generation curves. Stochastic dual dynamic programming (SDDP) is a state-of-the-art algorithm for long- and medium-term hydropower scheduling with a linear problem formulation. A recently proposed extension of the SDDP method known as stochastic dual dynamic integer programming (SDDiP) has proven convergence also in the nonconvex case. We apply the SDDiP algorithm to the medium-term hydropower scheduling (MTHS) problem and elaborate on how to incorporate stagewise-dependent stochastic variables on the right-hand sides and the objective of the optimization problem. Finally, we demonstrate the capability of the SDDiP algorithm on a case study for a Norwegian hydropower producer. The case study demonstrates that it is possible but time-consuming to solve the MTHS problem to optimality. However, the case study shows that a new type of cut, known as strengthened Benders cut, significantly contributes to close the optimality gap compared to classical Benders cuts.

Highlights

  • T HE hydropower scheduling problem is difficult given its stochastic and multistage nature, and a variety of different solution techniques have been applied to it, see e.g. [1], [2]

  • We found that the integer cuts are not very computationally efficient compared to solution improvement when applied for the given case study

  • The strengthened Benders cut significantly improves solution quality compared to ordinary Benders cuts with only a modest increase in computational

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

T HE hydropower scheduling problem is difficult given its stochastic and multistage nature, and a variety of different solution techniques have been applied to it, see e.g. [1], [2]. Milton Stewart School of Industrial & Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA He is a Research Scientist at Amazon Web Services. There are other types of nonconvexities that occur in the MTHS problem, such as the generation-discharge function that is dependent on the water head, discharge from multiple reservoirs to one power station and other topological constraints in the hydropower system. These nonconvexities should be represented in the ST operative models and in the MTHS models that provide the expected opportunity cost of water to them

MSSP Problems
Stochastic Dual Dynamic Programming
Contributions
THE MTHS PROBLEM
Stochastic Processes
Approximation of the Energy Price
REVIEW OF THE SDDIP APPROACH
Cut Families
Cut Discussion
The Approximate SDDiP Problem
BOUNDING THE EFP FUNCTION
CASE STUDY
Results
B B-SB B-SB-I
DISCUSSION
Findings
VIII. CONCLUSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call