Abstract
Louisiana’s bridges used two-girder or truss systems in the 1950 s and 1960 s, in which floorbeams are carried by main members and continuous stringers are supported by the floorbeams. The main members are either two edge (fascia) girders or trusses. Continuous span stringer bottom flanges are in compression in their negative moment regions, which could result in lateral torsional buckling (LTB). When these stringers are load rated using AASHTOWare Bridge RatingTM analysis software, lateral torsional buckling (LTB) resistance is calculated in accordance with the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, which the authors have determined may not adequately account for bracing effects provided by a noncomposite deck, and therefore could underestimate the flexural strength. Resulting ratings may be low enough to require restrictive, and possibly unnecessary, load postings or even bridge closures. This issue affects more than 20 significant bridges that are key parts of Louisiana’s highway system. To address the challenge of underestimated stringer LTB resistance and assess bracing effects provided by a concrete deck, experimental and analytical studies were performed on a two-span, continuous, steel stringers in a grillage system, which included three stringer lines, an interior transverse support (floorbeam), and transverse diaphragms at the end supports. The tests encompassed a variety of configurations, with and without a concrete deck. This paper describes laboratory testing setups and discusses experimental results, focusing on bracing effects on LTB resistance due to the presence of a noncomposite concrete deck. Finite element models using ANSYS were calibrated, validated using test results and used to simulate stringer behavior in Louisiana’s representative bridges. Finite element analyses of various tests showed generally comparable results to test data, and provided a feasible approach to load rate continuous stringers if a refined analysis is deemed necessary. The studies showed that stringer LTB resistance could possibly be tripled when noncomposite deck bracing effects are considered.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.