Abstract

Secondary flows involving cross flow at high stage loading in modern axial compressors contribute significantly to efficiency limits. This paper summarizes an approach to control end wall flow using non-axisymmetric end walls. The challenge is to find the optimal non-axisymmetric end wall shape that results in the largest gain in performance. An automated multi-objective optimizer connected to a 3-D RANS flow solver was used to design the end wall contour. The process chain was applied to the rotor hub end wall of Configuration I of the Darmstadt Transonic Compressor. Several optimization strategies involving different objective functions to be minimized and the corresponding performances were compared. The parameters considered within the optimization process were isentropic stage efficiency, pressure loss in the rotor, throat area and secondary kinetic energy (SKE). A parameter variation was undertaken, leading to the following observations: Strong penalties on SKE at the rotor outlet and moderate penalties on isentropic efficiency, throat area and pressure ratio led to the best design. Isentropic efficiency could be raised by 0.12%, SKE at the rotor exit was reduced while the total pressure ratio of the stage remained constant. Strong penalties on efficiency and pressure ratio, a moderate one on throat area and a small one on SKE at the rotor outlet all led to a smaller increase in efficiency: 0.06%. On the other hand, a slight raise in the total pressure ratio could be achieved. A third optimization, eliminating the restriction on the throat area, was carried out to see which benefit in performance could be achieved without this geometrical restriction. Since the throat areas of all optimized geometries differ slightly from the datum value, an estimation was derived to see the extent to which the end wall profiling and cross section enlargement contribute to the improvements. Finally, a method to display secondary flows in turbomachinery is introduced. A second CFD simulation is used to calculate the primary flow where the hub end wall is defined as an Euler wall to avoid the end wall boundary layer and so eliminate the cause for some of the secondary flow mechanisms. This method clearly shows how the characteristics of secondary flow can be positively influenced by using non-axisymmetric end walls.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.