Abstract
Despite prior literature recommending against limb salvage in nonambulatory patients, peripheral endovascular interventions (PVI) continue to be carried out in this group of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) for various reasons. Clinical outcomes following these interventions are however not well-characterized. We aimed to compare in-hospital outcomes and 1-year amputation-free survival between ambulatory and nonambulatory patients with CLTI who underwent PVI.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Published version (
Free)
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
