Abstract

Re-classifying NAFLD as metabolic-associated fatty liver (MAFLD) has been proposed. While some people fulfil criteria for NAFLD, they do not have MAFLD; and whether NAFLD-only subjects have increased the risk of type 2 diabetes remains unknown. We compared risk of incident T2D in individuals with: (a) NAFLD-only; and (b) MAFLD, to individuals without fatty liver, considering effect modification by sex. 246 424 Koreans without diabetes or a secondary cause of ultrasound-diagnosed hepatic steatosis were studied. Subjects were stratified into: (a) NAFLD-only status and (b) NAFLD that overlapped with MAFLD (MAFLD). Cox proportional hazards models with incident T2D as the outcome were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for: (a) and (b). Models were adjusted for time-dependent covariates, and effect modification by sex was analysed in subgroups. A total of 5439 participants had NAFLD-only status and 56 839 met MAFLD criteria. During a median follow-up of 5.5 years, 8402 incident cases of T2D occurred. Multivariable-adjusted HRs (95% CI) for incident T2D comparing NAFLD-only and MAFLD to the reference (neither condition) were 2.39 (1.63-3.51) and 5.75 (5.17-6.36) (women), and 1.53 (1.25-1.88) and 2.60 (2.44-2.76) (men), respectively. The increased risk of T2D in the NAFLD-only group was higher in women than in men (p for interaction by sex <0.001) and consistently observed across all subgroups. Risk of T2D was increased in lean participants regardless of metabolic dysregulation (including prediabetes). NAFLD-only participants without metabolic dysregulation and the criteria for MAFLD are at increased risk of developing T2D. This association was consistently stronger in women than in men.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.