Non-Use of Force as a Core Principle in International Law: An Evaluation of Recent Situations

Abstract

The world craves for peace and the growing experiences of States in their relationship with other States leaves a gentle soul at the skepticism of the peace status of States in the world. The use of force in international world has been subjected to so much approval and disapproval at the same time. The enigma of the reason behind its need for resolution, its status and its approval is still a matter of utmost consideration. States are so inclined to their use of force that it forms the response in defense of their territory. However, a country is entitled to act in self-defense as a general assertion. This is the major argument States like Israel, United States and many more resort to when challenged of their use of force against other States. Force however can be just and legal premised on the circumstances that gives rise to it. Within the framework of the United Nations, there could be a declaration for war when the need arises. It performed this function when there is an imminent threat to peace in the international community. The Security Council of the United Nations is empowered by its Charter to ensure peace and proclaim war when necessary. Against this background the author succinctly examines the development of the customary international law of non-use of force in the face of current challenges in the international community sphere.